Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Government of Canada navigation bar
Canada.ca
Services
Departments
Français
Canadian Biodiversity Information Facility (CBIF)
Search
Search website
Search
Site
menu
Programs and Services
AgriInvest
AgriStability
Agricultural business management
Youth in agriculture
My AAFC Account
Programs and Services – Main page
Industry, Markets and Trade
Canadian agri-food sector
International trade of agri-food products
Industry, Markets and Trade – Main page
Science and Innovation
Agriculture and agri-food research centres and collections
Scientific staff and expertise
Agricultural practices
Agricultural research results
Technology transfer and licensing – Agriculture
International engagement
Science and Innovation – Main page
Help
Site map
Alphabetical subject index
Help with alternative formats
Help – Main page
Breadcrumb trail
Home
Integrated Taxonomic Information System
Search Records
Search Results
Record Details
Record Details
Scientific Name:
Eucharis Democles
Taxonomy and Nomenclature
Kingdom:
Animalia
Rank:
Subfamily
Synonym(s):
Common Name(s):
Taxonomic Status
Current Standing:
valid
Data Quality Indicators
Record Credibility Rating:
TWG standards met
Global Species Completeness:
Currency Rating:
Taxonomic Hierarchy
- up to the kingdom
Kingdom
Animalia
Subkingdom
Bilateria
Infrakingdom
Protostomia
Superphylum
Ecdysozoa
Phylum
Arthropoda
Subphylum
Hexapoda
Class
Insecta
Subclass
Pterygota
Infraclass
Neoptera
Superorder
Holometabola
Order
Hymenoptera
Suborder
Apocrita
Infraorder
Aculeata
Superfamily
Vespoidea
Family
Formicidae
Subfamily
Formicinae
- down one level
References
Expert(s):
Other Sources:
website: Hymenoptera Name Server; http://atbi.biosci.ohio-state.edu:8880/hymenoptera/nomenclator.home_page
References:
Geographic Information
Geographic Information:
Jurisdiction:
Comments
Comments:
Norman Johnson: The epithet is capitalized because that's the way Francis Walker published it. The genus Eucharis is actually a chalcidoid, i.e., it is classified in a different superfamily from ants. However, the type specimen of this species is not a chalcidoid at all, but the male of some unidentified ant in the subfamily Formicidae. I think the basic problem here is that the taxonomists have recognized a problem, but haven't figured out how to resolve it: it's still a work in progress
Internet Search
Images:
Google Images
Specialized Internet Databases:
NCBI
Medline
CISTI/CAL
(
Periodicals
Books
)
Authoritative Information Sources
Version:
1.5-SNAPSHOT