Détails de l’enregistrement

Nom scientifique:
Bos grunniens mutus

Taxonomie et nomenclature

Règne:
Animalia
Rang:
Species
synonyme(s):
Bos mutus
Nom(s) commun(s):
wild yak [English]

Statut taxonomique

Courant:
valid

Indicateurs de qualité des données

Évaluation de la crédibilité de l’enregistrement:
TWG standards met
Traitement des espèces au niveau mondial:

Taux (fréquence) d’usage:

Hiérarchie taxonomique

- à partir du règne

Kingdom
Subkingdom
Infrakingdom
Phylum
Subphylum
Infraphylum
Superclass
Class
Subclass
Infraclass
Order
Family
Subfamily
Genus
Species

- un niveau plus bas

Références

Expert(s):
Alfred L. Gardner. Curator of North American mammals and Chief of Mammal Section, National Biological Service, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, USA
Peter Grubb. 35 Downhills Park Road, London N17 6PE, England
Autres sources:
website: U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Program-05/01; http://www.fws.gov/endangered/
database: NODC Taxonomic Code;
database: U. S. Dept. Interior;
Références:
Wilson, Don E., and DeeAnn M. Reeder, eds. 2005-10-01. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 3rd ed., vols. 1 & 2. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 2142. 0-8018-8221-4. .
Ellerman, J. R., and T. C. S Morrison-Scott 1966-07-01. Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals: 1758-1946, Second Edition. Trustees of the British Museum of Natural History. London, England. . . .

Information géographique

Information géographique:
Southern Asia
Champ d’application:

Commentaires

Commentaires:
David Mitchell, ITIS: ITIS defers to Wilson & Reeder (eds., 2005) on the correct name for a species when the choice is between an older name based on a domestic form and a younger name based on a wild form. ICZN Opinion 2027 (3/2003) sought to resolve this, but by itself the Ruling contained in that Opinion effectively says that it cannot be based on priority. More explicit guidance is found in the "History of Case 3010" section of the Opinion, but ITIS has been advised that only the Ruling section is binding. Thus, there is apparently no basis upon which to select the correct (valid) name

Recherche sur Internet

Images:
Bases de données spécialisées sur Internet:

Bonnes sources d’information